Issue 1077: Mistake in the SCDDB Contributed Diagrams
- Object
- My Jo (Dance)
- Submitter
- Heiko Schmidt (castle_ghost)
- Assigned to
- Anselm Lingnau
- Priority
- Normal
- Disposition
- Fixed
- Description
-
Hi Anselm,
at bar 9 the standing persons should be exchanged, because they end the turn in each others places.
Cheers, Heiko
Previous Actions
- Date Jan. 18, 2017, 5:49 p.m.
- User Heiko Schmidt (castle_ghost)
New issue submitted
- Date Jan. 20, 2017, 10:53 p.m.
- User Heiko Schmidt (castle_ghost)
Assigned changed to »anselm« (previously »None«)
I guess you are in charge of the Contributed Diagrams…
- Date Sept. 14, 2017, 1:58 p.m.
- User Eric Ferguson (EricFerguson)
Disposition changed to »Needs help« (previously »New«)
This applies to [5-8] and [13-16], and also to [17] where the diagram does not show all are on opposite side.
We need to delete the diagram, unless we can ask the diagram author to correct it. Anselm: how do we find him? Or do we delete? Eric
- Date Sept. 14, 2017, 3:09 p.m.
- User Heiko Schmidt (castle_ghost)
Hi Eric, hi Anselm,
from the style of the diagram, I guess the diagram writer is Anselm himself. This is the style you could find on the Frankfurt programs long before Anselm took over SCDDB.
The numbers I was referring to were the unboxed 1 and uncircled 2 at the beginning of bar 9.
Whether the persons above the turns (bars 5-8 and 13-16) should be ordered by number (as in that diagram) or to reflect the position (as in Keiths) is a matter of taste. I have seen both over the years. And I do not mind either - although position-wise might be more intuitive here.
So basically, Anselm has to decide what to do with ‘his’ diagram ;) That’s why I have assigned this to Anselm in the first place…
Would there be an easy way to initiate a reminder to the person the issue is assigned to every once in a while if the disposition is not “fixed” or “ignored”? Currently, I think only the ‘Eric-App’ is going through open issues from time to time ;)
Cheers, Heiko
- Date Jan. 16, 2023, 5:24 p.m.
- User Viktor Lehmann (tone2tone)
Reminder ;-) yes, bar 9 with the unboxed persons is wrong, they should be changed. As with some other diagram before, I think it would be best to delete the diagram altogether now that we have a Keith Rose diagram for it, which to me is Anselm’s choice and task.
- Date Jan. 16, 2023, 6:05 p.m.
- User Anselm Lingnau (anselm)
Disposition changed to »Fixed« (previously »Needs help«)
Removed the erroneous diagram.
- Date Jan. 17, 2023, 1:19 a.m.
- User Eric Ferguson (EricFerguson)
I have added the progression (2,1) in the e-crib Eric