We're using cookies to make this site more secure, featureful and efficient.

Issue 1077: Mistake in the SCDDB Contributed Diagrams

Object
My Jo (Dance)
Submitter
Heiko Schmidt (castle_ghost)
Assigned to
Anselm Lingnau
Priority
Normal
Disposition
Fixed
Description

Hi Anselm,

at bar 9 the standing persons should be exchanged, because they end the turn in each others places.

Cheers, Heiko

Previous Actions

  • Date  Jan. 18, 2017, 5:49 p.m.
  • User  Heiko Schmidt (castle_ghost)

New issue submitted

  • Date  Jan. 20, 2017, 10:53 p.m.
  • User  Heiko Schmidt (castle_ghost)

Assigned changed to »anselm« (previously »None«)

I guess you are in charge of the Contributed Diagrams…

  • Date  Sept. 14, 2017, 1:58 p.m.
  • User  Eric Ferguson (EricFerguson)

Disposition changed to »Needs help« (previously »New«)

This applies to [5-8] and [13-16], and also to [17] where the diagram does not show all are on opposite side.

We need to delete the diagram, unless we can ask the diagram author to correct it. Anselm: how do we find him? Or do we delete? Eric

  • Date  Sept. 14, 2017, 3:09 p.m.
  • User  Heiko Schmidt (castle_ghost)

Hi Eric, hi Anselm,

from the style of the diagram, I guess the diagram writer is Anselm himself. This is the style you could find on the Frankfurt programs long before Anselm took over SCDDB.

The numbers I was referring to were the unboxed 1 and uncircled 2 at the beginning of bar 9.

Whether the persons above the turns (bars 5-8 and 13-16) should be ordered by number (as in that diagram) or to reflect the position (as in Keiths) is a matter of taste. I have seen both over the years. And I do not mind either - although position-wise might be more intuitive here.

So basically, Anselm has to decide what to do with ‘his’ diagram ;) That’s why I have assigned this to Anselm in the first place…

Would there be an easy way to initiate a reminder to the person the issue is assigned to every once in a while if the disposition is not “fixed” or “ignored”? Currently, I think only the ‘Eric-App’ is going through open issues from time to time ;)

Cheers, Heiko

  • Date  Jan. 16, 2023, 5:24 p.m.
  • User  Viktor Lehmann (tone2tone)

Reminder ;-) yes, bar 9 with the unboxed persons is wrong, they should be changed. As with some other diagram before, I think it would be best to delete the diagram altogether now that we have a Keith Rose diagram for it, which to me is Anselm’s choice and task.

  • Date  Jan. 16, 2023, 6:05 p.m.
  • User  Anselm Lingnau (anselm)

Disposition changed to »Fixed« (previously »Needs help«)

Removed the erroneous diagram.

  • Date  Jan. 17, 2023, 1:19 a.m.
  • User  Eric Ferguson (EricFerguson)

I have added the progression (2,1) in the e-crib Eric